Maxima Global Executive Search

Home › Guides › The first 100 days of a new plant head or country head

The first 100 days of a new plant head or country head

The first 100 days tend to set the pattern for the first year, since a plant head or country head arrives with a mandate but does not yet know the site, the market or the people. What follows describes the usual shape of the period and what an employer can do to help; it is general practice, not a fixed formula.

What should be agreed before day one?

Four things are usually written down before the person starts: the mandate, the decision rights, the first-year targets and the first week's meetings.

The mandate states why the role exists, whether that is to fix a plant, grow a market, prepare a sale or run a steady operation. It works best when the new leader and the manager describe it in the same words.

Decision rights set out what the leader can decide alone and what needs approval. Typical items are capital spend, hiring and dismissal, commercial terms, supplier contracts, safety stops and dealings with regulators, and gaps here tend to cause friction later.

First-year targets are usually few, specific and tied to the mandate. Two or three measures are easier to manage than ten, and the way progress will be reviewed is normally agreed alongside them.

The week-one schedule names who the person meets and in what order. It usually covers the manager, the leadership team, the head of safety, finance, the main customers and the local regulator.

The first 30 days

The first 30 days are for listening and for seeing the operation at first hand, and new leaders generally avoid large decisions in this period unless safety requires them.

A plant head typically walks the site on every shift, including nights and weekends. A country head visits the offices, the main customers, the distributors and the main suppliers. Both tend to ask the same open questions of many people and write down the answers.

The first formal task is usually a review of safety and compliance, which means reading recent incident reports, audit findings, permits and licences, and any open regulatory matters. The aim is to know the exposure, not to assign blame.

Leaders meet the whole team, one to one with direct reports and in groups with the wider workforce. Where there is a union or works council, its representatives are met early and in the company of the HR head. Meetings with the regulators and the main customers are often held with a colleague who knows them, where possible.

By day 30 the leader typically has a list of observations and open questions, not a plan.

What happens between day 30 and day 60?

In this period the leader writes a diagnosis and agrees it with the manager. The diagnosis sets out what is working, what is not, what the evidence is and what the leader proposes to do about it.

A useful diagnosis is short. It covers safety and compliance, performance against targets, the team, customers and the main risks, and it separates facts from opinion and says where the evidence is thin.

The manager and the leader usually discuss it in one or two sessions, with the purpose of agreeing on the problems before agreeing on solutions. Any difference with the original mandate tends to come out here. If the situation is different from the one described at hiring, this is the point to say so and to adjust the targets or the resources.

Short checks with the team on the diagnosis help to confirm it, and leaders who skip this step often find that the first changes meet resistance they did not expect.

Day 60 to day 100

This is when the leader makes the first changes, takes the first team decisions and produces the plan for the year.

First changes tend to be a small number of visible actions that address agreed problems and can be completed. They may cover a safety measure, a customer issue, a reporting routine or a stalled project. Early changes that are modest and finished build more credibility than large changes that are left open.

Team decisions rest on what the leader has seen. They may include confirming people in roles, moving people, filling gaps and, where needed, ending employment. These steps follow local law and company policy, and the HR head is usually involved from the start.

By day 100 the leader presents a plan for the year to the manager. It links to the agreed targets, states the resources needed and sets the review dates, and it is short enough for the team to remember.

What does the employer usually provide?

Four things come up most often: a sponsor, access, introductions and a check-in rhythm.

A sponsor is a senior person, not the line manager, who can explain how the organisation works and hear concerns. The sponsor is normally named before day one.

Access means systems, data, sites and people. The leader is normally given reports, safety records, financial data and site entry without having to ask for them. In a plant, that includes the permits and the incident history. In a country role, it includes the customer and distributor files.

Introductions to customers, regulators, union representatives and local leaders are usually best made by the employer in the first weeks, and a leader who arrives from another country or sector depends on them.

A check-in rhythm means a fixed weekly conversation with the manager in the first month, then every two weeks to day 100, with a formal review at day 30, day 60 and day 100.

Why do new leaders struggle?

The reasons are well known in general practice, and most can be prevented.

Sometimes the mandate is unclear or changes after the person arrives, and the leader is judged on targets that were never agreed. Decision rights may be vague, so the leader acts and is overruled, or waits and is seen as slow.

Some leaders act too quickly, before understanding the site or market, and lose the team; others act too slowly and are seen as absent.

Others do not build relations outside the immediate team, although safety, regulators, customers and unions each need early attention.

In some cases the employer does not give access, introductions or feedback, so the leader works alone and the manager hears about problems late.

A leader moving across countries may also underestimate local practice on notice, labour law, hierarchy and holidays, and time with a local colleague is useful.

How a search firm usually stays in touch

Practice varies, and nothing here is a promise. Many search firms stay in contact with both the client and the new leader through the first months after the start.

A common pattern is a call with the new leader in the first weeks and again around the end of the first quarter, with a similar call to the manager or the HR head on how the client sees the start. The search firm can pass on questions, but the line manager and the sponsor remain responsible for the leader's performance.

Conversations of this kind are confidential to the extent agreed at the outset, so both sides usually know in advance what will be shared. The firm's role is to listen and to raise issues early, and it does not manage the leader.

Questions clients and candidates ask

Should a new plant head make changes in the first month?

Usually not, unless there is a safety or legal reason. The first month is for visits, reading and listening, and early changes made without that groundwork are often reversed.

Who writes the day 60 diagnosis?

The new leader writes it, using what has been learned in the first 30 days, and agrees it with the manager. The sponsor or HR head can comment, but the leader owns it.

How many targets should a first-year plan have?

Two or three. A small number of measures tied to the mandate is easier to follow and review than a long list.

Does the search firm run the 100-day plan?

No. The employer and the leader own it. A search firm may stay in contact with both sides, but it does not manage the leader or the plan.

To discuss a search, write to teamsg@maxima.com.sg.

Published by Maxima Global Executive Search, Singapore. Last updated November 2026. General information, not legal or tax advice.

We assess every candidate on experience and ability alone. We follow Singapore’s Tripartite Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices and the Fair Consideration Framework, and we already work to the standard of the Workplace Fairness Act 2025. We never charge candidates a fee. How we hire fairly